Seattle City Attorney's Office moves to disqualify activist judge from hearing any 'criminal cases moving forward'

[Walter Duerson]

The Seattle City Attorney has issued an Affidavit of Prejudice in an
attempt to preclude a radical judge from hearing any criminal cases
brought by the office.

On Friday, the Seattle City Attorney’s Office (CAO) announced that it will
file the affidavit of prejudice against Seattle Municipal Court Judge
Pooja Vaddadi.

According to the CAO, “An affidavit of prejudice is a preemptory
disqualification of a judge to hear a case. In this circumstance, the CAO
has made the decision to preclude Judge Vaddadi from hearing any criminal
cases brought by the CAO.”

Seattle City Attorney Ann Davison said in a statement, “Public safety is
among our highest priorities, and this includes trying cases on behalf of
those victimized by crime. Unfortunately, we have encountered a regular
pattern of biased rulings.”

The decision to issue the affidavit was recommended by CAO Criminal
Division Chief Natalie Walton-Anderson and approved by Davison.

Chief Walton-Anderson wrote in a memorandum to the CAO Criminal Division,
“For the past several months, we have internally discussed the Criminal
Division’s serious concerns with the conduct and rulings of Judge Pooja
Vaddadi.”

“Unfortunately, as outlined below, those concerns have only continued to
mount in the past several months. As a result, I have made the difficult
decision that the office will submit affidavits of prejudice for Judge
Vaddadi on all criminal cases moving forward.”

Chief Walton-Anderson informed Judge Vaddadi and Presiding Judge Faye
Chess of the CAO’s decision on Wednesday and outlined key issues from the
memo alleging that Judge Vaddadi routinely overrules prior findings of
probable cause by her fellow judges; repeatedly fails to find probable
cause in situations where, clearly, probable cause exists; makes improper
rulings related to public safety in domestic violence and DUI cases; and
frequently makes erroneous evidentiary rulings for unjustified reasons,
rather than articulating any legal analysis.

Chief Walton-Anderson wrote in the CAO memo, “Judge Vaddadi routinely
raises arguments on behalf of defendants without prompting or argument
from their own attorneys.”

“The resounding input from attorneys that have appeared in her courtroom
is that her decisions demonstrate a complete lack of understanding, or
perhaps even intentional disregard, of the evidence rules, even on basic
issues.”

Seattle has been suffering from a so-called “revolving door” justice
system for years, where prosecutors chose not to prosecute crimes or
liberal judges chose not to sentence criminals appropriately.

Davison was elected in 2021 by voters who finally had enough of the
ongoing chaos in the Emerald City.

Since then, her office has worked to target prolific offenders in Seattle
who are responsible for a majority of the crimes.

On Friday, Davison’s office also announced it was reviewing criminal
charges against a group of activists who disrupted last week's city
council meeting demanding the city provide housing for illegal immigrants.

The announcement was a 180 degree pivot under a new more moderate council
from the previous radical council that allowed activists to control the
agenda.

https://thepostmillennial.com/seattle-city-attorneys-office-moves-to-
disqualify-activist-judge-from-hearing-any-criminal-cases-moving-
forward?utm_campaign=64470

[a425couple]

Post by Walter Duerson
The Seattle City Attorney has issued an Affidavit of Prejudice in an
attempt to preclude a radical judge from hearing any criminal cases
brought by the office.

Rather than accepting responsibility, Judge Pooja Vaddadi has decided
to argue and fight. Will the votes dismiss her next election?

Post by Walter Duerson
On Friday, the Seattle City Attorney’s Office (CAO) announced that it will
file the affidavit of prejudice against Seattle Municipal Court Judge
Pooja Vaddadi.
According to the CAO, “An affidavit of prejudice is a preemptory
disqualification of a judge to hear a case. In this circumstance, the CAO
has made the decision to preclude Judge Vaddadi from hearing any criminal
cases brought by the CAO.”
Seattle City Attorney Ann Davison said in a statement, “Public safety is
among our highest priorities, and this includes trying cases on behalf of
those victimized by crime. Unfortunately, we have encountered a regular
pattern of biased rulings.”
The decision to issue the affidavit was recommended by CAO Criminal
Division Chief Natalie Walton-Anderson and approved by Davison.
Chief Walton-Anderson wrote in a memorandum to the CAO Criminal Division,
“For the past several months, we have internally discussed the Criminal
Division’s serious concerns with the conduct and rulings of Judge Pooja
Vaddadi.”
“Unfortunately, as outlined below, those concerns have only continued to
mount in the past several months. As a result, I have made the difficult
decision that the office will submit affidavits of prejudice for Judge
Vaddadi on all criminal cases moving forward.”
Chief Walton-Anderson informed Judge Vaddadi and Presiding Judge Faye
Chess of the CAO’s decision on Wednesday and outlined key issues from the
memo alleging that Judge Vaddadi routinely overrules prior findings of
probable cause by her fellow judges; repeatedly fails to find probable
cause in situations where, clearly, probable cause exists; makes improper
rulings related to public safety in domestic violence and DUI cases; and
frequently makes erroneous evidentiary rulings for unjustified reasons,
rather than articulating any legal analysis.
Chief Walton-Anderson wrote in the CAO memo, “Judge Vaddadi routinely
raises arguments on behalf of defendants without prompting or argument
from their own attorneys.”
“The resounding input from attorneys that have appeared in her courtroom
is that her decisions demonstrate a complete lack of understanding, or
perhaps even intentional disregard, of the evidence rules, even on basic
issues.”
Seattle has been suffering from a so-called “revolving door” justice
system for years, where prosecutors chose not to prosecute crimes or
liberal judges chose not to sentence criminals appropriately.
Davison was elected in 2021 by voters who finally had enough of the
ongoing chaos in the Emerald City.
Since then, her office has worked to target prolific offenders in Seattle
who are responsible for a majority of the crimes.
On Friday, Davison’s office also announced it was reviewing criminal
charges against a group of activists who disrupted last week's city
council meeting demanding the city provide housing for illegal immigrants.
The announcement was a 180 degree pivot under a new more moderate council
from the previous radical council that allowed activists to control the
agenda.
https://thepostmillennial.com/seattle-city-attorneys-office-moves-to-
disqualify-activist-judge-from-hearing-any-criminal-cases-moving-
forward?utm_campaign=64470

[Khil Philed]

Post by a425couple

Post by Walter Duerson
The Seattle City Attorney has issued an Affidavit of Prejudice in an
attempt to preclude a radical judge from hearing any criminal cases
brought by the office.

Rather than accepting responsibility, Judge Pooja Vaddadi has decided
to argue and fight. Will the votes dismiss her next election?

It would be interesting to see some examples. Evidently she has made some
enemies.

Post by a425couple

Post by Walter Duerson
On Friday, the Seattle City Attorney’s Office (CAO) announced that
it will file the affidavit of prejudice against Seattle Municipal
Court Judge Pooja Vaddadi.
According to the CAO, “An affidavit of prejudice is a preemptory
disqualification of a judge to hear a case. In this circumstance, the
CAO has made the decision to preclude Judge Vaddadi from hearing any
criminal cases brought by the CAO.”
Seattle City Attorney Ann Davison said in a statement, “Public
safety is among our highest priorities, and this includes trying
cases on behalf of those victimized by crime. Unfortunately, we have
encountered a regular pattern of biased rulings.”
The decision to issue the affidavit was recommended by CAO Criminal
Division Chief Natalie Walton-Anderson and approved by Davison.
Chief Walton-Anderson wrote in a memorandum to the CAO Criminal
Division, “For the past several months, we have internally
discussed the Criminal Division’s serious concerns with the conduct
and rulings of Judge Pooja Vaddadi.”
“Unfortunately, as outlined below, those concerns have only
continued to mount in the past several months. As a result, I have
made the difficult decision that the office will submit affidavits of
prejudice for Judge Vaddadi on all criminal cases moving forward.”
Chief Walton-Anderson informed Judge Vaddadi and Presiding Judge Faye
Chess of the CAO’s decision on Wednesday and outlined key issues
from the memo alleging that Judge Vaddadi routinely overrules prior
findings of probable cause by her fellow judges; repeatedly fails to
find probable cause in situations where, clearly, probable cause
exists; makes improper rulings related to public safety in domestic
violence and DUI cases; and frequently makes erroneous evidentiary
rulings for unjustified reasons, rather than articulating any legal
analysis.
Chief Walton-Anderson wrote in the CAO memo, “Judge Vaddadi
routinely raises arguments on behalf of defendants without prompting
or argument from their own attorneys.”
“The resounding input from attorneys that have appeared in her
courtroom is that her decisions demonstrate a complete lack of
understanding, or perhaps even intentional disregard, of the evidence
rules, even on basic issues.”
Seattle has been suffering from a so-called “revolving door”
justice system for years, where prosecutors chose not to prosecute
crimes or liberal judges chose not to sentence criminals
appropriately.
Davison was elected in 2021 by voters who finally had enough of the
ongoing chaos in the Emerald City.
Since then, her office has worked to target prolific offenders in
Seattle who are responsible for a majority of the crimes.
On Friday, Davison’s office also announced it was reviewing
criminal charges against a group of activists who disrupted last
week's city council meeting demanding the city provide housing for
illegal immigrants.
The announcement was a 180 degree pivot under a new more moderate
council from the previous radical council that allowed activists to
control the agenda.
https://thepostmillennial.com/seattle-city-attorneys-office-moves-to-
disqualify-activist-judge-from-hearing-any-criminal-cases-moving-
forward?utm_campaign=64470

[pyotr filipivich]

Let the Record show that a425couple <***@hotmail.com> on or
about Tue, 5 Mar 2024 19:26:24 -0800 did write, type or otherwise

Post by a425couple

Post by Walter Duerson
The Seattle City Attorney has issued an Affidavit of Prejudice in an
attempt to preclude a radical judge from hearing any criminal cases
brought by the office.

Rather than accepting responsibility, Judge Pooja Vaddadi has decided
to argue and fight. Will the votes dismiss her next election?

Doubtful. The voters of Seattle have become progressively more
and more leftist as the saner ones move away.

tschus
pyotr