Newscum barfs lies again

[clams casino]

At $10,000 per deportation what do
you propose doing

They walked all the way here - they can walk all the way home.

Wearing ankle monitors:

https://www.alibaba.com/showroom/ankle-monitor.html
GPS tracking offender tamper-proof Correctional ankle GPS bracelet GPS
home monitoring
$65.00-$75.00


Buh bye!

[Chris Ahlstrom]

Post by clams casino

At $10,000 per deportation what do
you propose doing

They walked all the way here - they can walk all the way home.

You're a moron.

[Lil dwarf Rudey]

Post by Chris Ahlstrom
You're a moron.

STFU, Rudence!

You are a rampant public death threat maker and Suckramento dwarf named
Jonathan D Ball.

FOAD, you relentless traitor to America~!

Governor Swill /Rudy Canoza/Lou Bricano/J Carlson/Michael A
Terrell/Chris Ahlstrom/D.Ray/Henry Bodkin/Al Feldhauser
Susan Cohen and a dozen other forged socks of living and dead posters wrote:

Multiple death threats against Trump:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!netnews.com!s1-4.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <***@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <***@4ax.com>
References: <***@earthlink.com>
<***@185.151.15.160>
<ONIkO.102541$***@fx11.ams4> <***@185.151.15.190>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 55
X-Complaints-To: ***@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:38:43 -0400

Oh poor me I got shot at ...

Swill
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!s1-3.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <***@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <***@4ax.com>
References: <***@earthlink.com>
<***@185.151.15.160>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 31
X-Complaints-To: ***@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:37:51 -0400


Cheer up, maybe someone else will try.

Swill

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: J Carlson <***@gmx.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.immigration,alt.politics.nationalism.white,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: AP Lies by Ommission About Identity of Invaders Charged with
Rape, Murder of 12-Year-Old
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:35:52 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <v5f66o$1mps9$***@dont-email.me>
References: <v54h6j$39cuk$***@dont-email.me> <v54hrs$38mfs$***@dont-email.me>
<moKcnZP3dbqUm-***@giganews.com>
<v58c4f$6squ$***@dont-email.me>
<v5df1n$1caue$***@dont-email.me> <v5edju$1hv3p$***@dont-email.me>
<***@4ax.com>
<v5erpf$1jkrf$***@dont-email.me>
<O9acnRiefIZol-***@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:35:53 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me;
posting-host="f3de9d0c1e618b255237332494133eec";
logging-data="1795977";
mail-complaints-to="***@eternal-september.org";
posting-account="U2FsdGVkX195k8uMNmZfnyDG9tQmsu21WqljX3bfQxM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PNoPW9d+9gKJj0fX+YCk+YFslQg=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <O9acnRiefIZol-***@giganews.com>
Xref: news.eternal-september.org alt.politics.immigration:383549
alt.politics.nationalism.white:10913 talk.politics.misc:1295918
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:3024985

Post by Chris Ahlstrom
No. I am a patriotic American who wants the country and its people to

thrive. Getting rid of Trump permanently

Post by Chris Ahlstrom
is an important step to getting there.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


That constitutes a DEATH THREAT against a former President, Rudey:


https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/871
18 U.S. Code § 871 - Threats against President and successors to the
Presidency
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
(a)Whoever knowingly and willfully deposits for conveyance in the mail
or for a delivery from any post office or by any letter carrier any
letter, paper, writing, print, missive, or document containing any
threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon
the President of the United States, the President-elect, the Vice
President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office
of President of the United States, or the Vice President-elect, or
knowingly and willfully otherwise makes any such threat against the
President, President-elect, Vice President or other officer next in the
order of succession to the office of President, or Vice President-elect,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years,
or both.
(b)The terms “President-elect” and “Vice President-elect” as used in
this section shall mean such persons as are the apparent successful
candidates for the offices of President and Vice President,
respectively, as ascertained from the results of the general elections
held to determine the electors of President and Vice President in
accordance with title 3, United States Code, sections 1 and 2. The
phrase “other officer next in the order of succession to the office of
President” as used in this section shall mean the person next in the
order of succession to act as President in accordance with title 3,
United States Code, sections 19 and 20.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 740; June 1, 1955, ch. 115, § 1, 69
Stat. 80; Pub. L. 87–829, § 1, Oct. 15, 1962, 76 Stat. 956; Pub. L.
97–297, § 2, Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1318; Pub. L. 103–322, title
XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

9-65.200 - Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency; Threats Against Former Presidents; and Certain Other Secret
Service Protectees
The Counterterrorism Section of the National Security Division has
supervisory authority over 18 U.S.C. §§ 871 and 879 cases. As great
caution must be taken in matters relating to the security of the persons
protected by 18 U.S.C. § 871, United States Attorneys are encouraged to
consult with the Counterterrorism Section (CTS) of the National Security
Division when they have doubts on the prosecutive merit of a case. For
the same reason, dismissal of complaints under 18 U.S.C. § 871, when the
defendant is in custody under the Mental Incompetency Statutes (18
U.S.C. §§ 4244, 4246), requires approval from CTS. In other cases,
United States Attorneys must consult prior to dismissing a count
involving, or entering into any sentence commitment or other case
settlement involving a § 871 charge.


https://www.secretservice.gov/newsroom/releases/2024/01/phoenix-man-arrested-making-online-death-threats-against-president-and

PHOENIX –David Michael Hanson, 41, of Phoenix, was arrested on Wednesday
for making online threats against the President and Vice-President.
Hanson was charged by Federal criminal complaint on Tuesday with five
counts of Threats Against the President and Successors to the Presidency
and five counts of Interstate Communication of Threats.

The complaint alleges that in November and December of 2023, while
living in Arizona, Hanson used a social media platform to post threats
to murder the President and Vice President of the United States. On
November 19, 2023, Hanson posted online a series of threatening
statements including one that stated, “#joeAndKamala I’m asking you to
resign on Monday your alternative is death brutally murdered.” After the
U.S. Secret Service spoke to Hanson and warned him that it was a Federal
crime to post such threats, on December 23, 2023, Hanson posted another
series of similar threats aimed at the President and Vice-President.

Each count of Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison, a fine of
up to $250,000, and up to three years of supervised release. Each count
of Interstate Communication of Threats carries a maximum sentence of
five years in prison, a fine of up to $250,000, and up to three years of
supervised release.

A complaint is simply a method by which a person is charged with
criminal activity and raises no inference of guilt. An individual is
presumed innocent until evidence is presented to a jury that establishes
guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

The United States Secret Service is conducting the investigation in this
case. The United States Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, is
handling the prosecution.


Those can be reported here:

https://tips.fbi.gov/home

https://www.justice.gov/action-center/report-crime-or-submit-complaint

https://www.secretservice.gov/contact

https://www.dhs.gov/see-something-say-something/reporting/california


Fellow citizens, won't you join in ending Rudey's terrorism here?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Siri Cruise]

Post by clams casino

At $10,000 per deportation what do
you propose doing

They walked all the way here - they can walk all the way home.

Nothing can be done until a court is paid to issue a deportation
order.

Mexican nationals can be deported by just driving them to the
border and pushing them across.

[clams casino]

Post by clams casino

At $10,000 per deportation what do
you propose doing

They walked all the way here - they can walk all the way home.

Nothing can be done until a court is paid to issue a deportation order.

Wrong:
Amdt5.6.2.2 Exclusion of Aliens Seeking Entry into the United States
Fifth Amendment:

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous
crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in
cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in
actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be
subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or
limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness
against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without
due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use,
without just compensation.

According to the Supreme Court, aliens seeking initial entry into the
United States have no constitutional rights regarding their applications
for admission.1 The Court has reasoned that the government has the
inherent, sovereign authority to admit or exclude aliens, and that
aliens standing outside of the geographic boundaries of the United
States have no vested right to be admitted into the country.2

Mexican nationals can be deported by just driving them to the border and
pushing them across.

La Tren de Aragua may be a tougher transport, for them we favor
execution on sight.

[Citizen Winston Smith]

Nothing can be done until a court is paid to issue a deportation order.

Untrue:


https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/amdt5-6-2-2/ALDE_00013725/

Amdt5.6.2.2 Exclusion of Aliens Seeking Entry into the United States

According to the Supreme Court, aliens seeking initial entry into the
United States have no constitutional rights regarding their applications
for admission.1 The Court has reasoned that the government has the
inherent, sovereign authority to admit or exclude aliens, and that
aliens standing outside of the geographic boundaries of the United
States have no vested right to be admitted into the country.2

Thus, in its 1953 decision in Shaughnessy v. United States ex rel.
Mezei, the Court held that the government could deny entry to an alien
without a hearing, notwithstanding the alien’s temporary harborage on
Ellis Island pending the government’s attempts to remove him from the
United States.3 More recently, in Department of Homeland Security v.
Thuraissigiam, the Court in 2020 rejected an alien’s constitutional
challenge to a federal statute that limits judicial review of an
expedited order of removal, reasoning that the alien—who was apprehended
shortly after entering the United States unlawfully—could be considered
to be an applicant for admission at the border.4 In short, for aliens
seeking admission into the United States, the decision to permit or deny
entry by an executive or administrative officer, acting within powers
expressly conferred by Congress, is due process of law.5

In certain cases, the exclusion of an alien has been seen to implicate
the rights of U.S. citizens. In its 1972 decision in Kleindienst v.
Mandel, for example the Supreme Court appeared to recognize that U.S.
citizens’ First Amendment rights were affected by the denial of a
nonimmigrant visa to a Marxist journalist who had been invited to speak
in the United States by a group of university professors.6 In Mandel,
however, the Court also recognized that because the plenary
congressional power to make policies and rules for exclusion of aliens
has long been firmly established, the Court would uphold, in the face of
a constitutional challenge, an alien’s exclusion as long as there is a
facially legitimate and bona fide reason for the decision.7 Thus, even
when reviewing constitutional challenges brought by U.S. citizens, the
Court has limited the scope of judicial review and adopted a highly
deferential standard for reviewing the decision to exclude an alien.8

U.S. citizens have also asserted that the exclusion of an alien has
impinged upon their due process rights.9 In Kerry v. Din, five Justices
in 2015 agreed that denying an immigrant visa to the husband of a U.S.
citizen on the grounds that he was inadmissible under a provision of
federal immigration law (pertaining to terrorist activities) did not
violate the due process rights of the U.S. citizen spouse.10 These
Justices differed in their reasoning, though. A three-Justice plurality
held that the U.S. citizen spouse had no protected liberty interest
under the Due Process Clause in her husband’s ability to come to the
United States, and did not decide whether the government had established
a facially legitimate and bona fide reason for excluding her husband.11
A two-Justice concurrence did not reach the question of whether the U.S.
citizen wife had asserted a protected liberty interest, but instead
concluded that the consular officials’ citation of a particular
statutory ground for inadmissibility as the basis for denying the visa
application satisfied due process under Mandel, which requires only that
the government state a facially legitimate and bona fide reason for the
denial.12

In Trump v. Hawaii, the Supreme Court in 2018 reaffirmed that there is
limited judicial review of executive decisions to exclude aliens seeking
admission from abroad.13 The Court rejected an Establishment Clause
challenge brought by U.S. citizens and other challengers to a
presidential proclamation that provided for the exclusion of specified
categories of nonresident aliens from mostly Muslim-majority
countries.14 The Court recognized that decisions concerning the
admission or exclusion of aliens generally lie beyond the scope of
judicial review, and are subject only to a highly constrained judicial
inquiry when an exclusion allegedly burdens the constitutional rights of
a U.S. citizen.15 The Court upheld the proclamation, ruling that it was
rationally related to the stated government objective of protecting
national security by excluding aliens from countries with deficient
information-sharing practices.16

In its 2024 decision in Dep’t of State v. Muñoz, the Supreme Court ruled
that a U.S. citizen lacks a constitutionally protected liberty interest
in her noncitizen spouse’s admission into the United States.17 Justice
Barrett, writing for five members of the majority, explained that the
Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause provides heightened protection
against government interference with certain fundamental rights and
liberty interests.18 Nonetheless, the Court determined that a U.S.
citizen’s asserted right to have her noncitizen spouse admitted into the
United States so that he could reside with her did not qualify as a
fundamental liberty interest.19 In reversing the lower court’s judgment
to the contrary, the Court concluded that such a right was not deeply
rooted in this Nation’s history and tradition because the federal
government had long exercised the sovereign power to set the terms
governing the admission and exclusion of noncitizens without granting
spouses a right to immigrate.20 Consequently, because the U.S. citizen
lacked a fundamental liberty interest that would allow her to invoke an
exception to the doctrine of consular nonreviewability, the State
Department’s denial of her husband’s visa application was not subject to
judicial review.21

https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-1911-8-usc-1325-unlawful-entry-failure-depart-fleeing-immigration

1911. 8 U.S.C. 1325 -- Unlawful Entry, Failure To Depart, Fleeing
Immigration Checkpoints, Marriage Fraud, Commercial Enterprise Fraud
Section 1325 sets forth criminal offenses relating to (1) improper entry
into the United States by an alien, (2) entry into marriage for the
purpose of evading immigration laws, and (3) establishing a commercial
enterprise for the purpose of evading immigration laws. The Illegal
Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) amended 8
U.S.C. § 1325 to provide that an alien apprehended while entering or
attempting to enter the United States at a time or place other than as
designated by immigration officers shall be subject to a civil penalty.

[Mitchell Holman]

Post by Siri Cruise

Post by clams casino

At $10,000 per deportation what do
you propose doing

They walked all the way here - they can walk all the way home.

Nothing can be done until a court is paid to issue a deportation
order.
Mexican nationals can be deported by just driving them to the
border and pushing them across.

And Haitian can be just pushed into the ocean.

Just What Jesus Would Do.